The ‘pandemic’ and danger of science illiteracy in America.



The dangerous ‘pandemic’ of science illiteracy in America.
By: Michael Pravica, Ph.D.
     Recently, I was asked to participate in a meeting and discussion on climate change for the Democratic party during the February debate in Las Vegas1. I was excited for the opportunity to offer some input on how to develop strategies to combat climate change and to possibly connect and work with other scientists on this critical and ever worsening problem.  However, to my immense disappointment, I quickly realized that all of the people present were politicians, activists, and other nonscientists.  I was the only bonafide scientist in the room.  We spent more time discussing the racial and gender diversity of the group and climate racism than climate change itself.  This is symptomatic of how token scientists are marginally “involved” in public discourse and decision-making on issues that are all about science.
     With this in mind, consider now how our nation is dealing with the COVID-19 crisis. Our president shut down an office dedicated to studying and handling pandemics and thought that this year’s flu vaccine would work with the coronavirus2 (!)  There is deep confusion, mixed messages, and ignorance among our elected officials and in the general public of how to protect oneself from deadly pathogens and prevent them from being spread.  This has caused critical errors in the preparation for and handling of this pandemic which means that we will suffer even more as a society.  Ignorance kills!  We also seem to have forgotten that an ounce of prevention (and preparation) prevents much more than a pound of cure. And now, we live in a tragic era where no one trusts anyone and fake news is ubiquitous and no one seems to trust scientists anymore and they are routinely censored.  Even a representative of the Chinese government tried to blame the US on the coronavirus based on a article in Global Research from Canada that was written by a businessman - not a scientist3-4! 
    This sadly is not the only example of poor decision making and mistrust of science because of worsening science illiteracy.  Our president has hired a slew of inexperienced and unqualified people to lead scientific and scientific-supporting organizations such as the Department of Education.  In one notable case, he hired an 80 year old physicist, emeritus Prof. William Happer (who is skeptical that there is any anthropogenic climate change) as his chief climate science czar5. I personally debated Prof. Happer in a mock trial of climate change in 2016 here in Las Vegas for the FreedomFest conference6 and was totally not impressed with his arguments.  He didn’t seem up-to-date on the latest climate science data and didn’t have an answer for me when I explained that CO2 isn’t the only greenhouse gas that we have to worry about - i.e. that we need to consider the effects of methane (released from melting permafrost) and smog (e.g. NO2 and SO2) when examining the “bigger picture” of how our atmosphere is being altered via all of these gases retaining more energy from the sun.   These are the kinds of people the President Trump brings into his inner circle to confirm his anti-science bias.  Add to this the fact that climate scientists have been routinely censored and even forbidden from presenting their results at scientific conferences7(!) when their conclusions don’t match the opinions of science-illiterate politicians8, and we can see a massive crisis brewing for our nation. Not understanding nature/science can have devastating consequences.  The coronavirus pandemic is merely the tip of the iceberg of what is to come.
     We are also suffering from science-illiteracy in the corporate sector despite the fact that it heavily relies on the benefits of science and applied science (engineering).  Boeing, once one of America’s great companies has been decimated because it chose to outsource large portions of the design, software and construction of its “next generation” airplanes (in particular the 737 MAX) to substandard engineering firms outside of the US.  Instead of completely redesigning the shell and frame of the plane to accommodate new, larger and far more powerful GE jet engines, they choose to largely keep the original design of the older 737 model and use correction software to “prevent” pilots from overcorrecting and overusing these powerful engines, which, due to their larger size could stall if the angle of attack was too high during takeoff.  This resulted (not surprisingly) in crashes of two of these planes because 1. the pilots had not been properly trained in how to use this software10 and 2. the software depended on a single angle-of-attack sensor11 which failed/was somehow damaged  in the case of at least one of the crashes.  No scientist or engineer with a proper education in science would ever design anything that depends on only one sensor - especially not for a plane. But for a company with profit as its only motive, this dumb action “makes sense” for the sake of saving a few dollars.  By outsourcing to cheaper third world inexperienced firms12, Boeing has lost billions of dollars and American prestige in the aviation industry has been seriously damaged.
     Another example of poor leadership pertaining to a manmade disaster was during the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil spill in the Gulf in 2010 which caused irreparable damage to natural ecosystems and massive economic damage to the Gulf region13.  Instead of dropping a few parking lots on top of the broken well head to permanently seal it14-15, BP wanted to preserve the well head16 and drilled a relief well to reduce pressure at the broken wellhead so it could be capped.  This action, which required months, released millions of gallons of toxic oil into the Gulf.  Yet again, science and Nature had to take a backseat to profit and politics.
    The key problem in America is that corporate CEOs and politicians often don’t have science or engineering degrees (Ph.D.s, M.Sc.s or B.Sc.s) but MBAs and JDs (respectively).  Yet, the fact is that our nation is so prosperous, more than any other reason, because of science.  Science permeates every aspect of our existence from our cell phones, medicine, construction, mining, agriculture, MRIs, satellites, jet engines/planes, road vehicles, electrical energy, food, microwaves, homes, clothing, internet and on and on.  We live in a day and age dominated by science.  In fact, there is simply no physical way that 7.7 billion people could inhabit this small planet without using the miracles derived from scientific inquiry. Whether it is the economy, national well being, or national security, we all heavily depend on the miracles derived from scientific research to drive innovation and seek solutions to impending crises such as climate change, overpopulation, pollution of our ecosystem, and resource management.  More than anything else, our achievements in scientific research made us the world’s chief superpower. 
    On top of that, the US has recently withdrawn from recent nuclear arms treaties with Russia essentially starting an arms race where the nation that offers the best support to scientists will end up engendering superior weapons17.  Are we really up to the challenge to start a new arms race when scientists are destitute and going to other nations such as China for research funding18 due to our leaders reducing funding for science?  Does our president honestly think that scientists can be as easily hired as gas station attendants? Ready at a moment’s notice to solve America’s critical science-based problems when he deems it necessary and then laid off again right afterwards?  Sorry, but that’s not how it works.  Training scientists takes decades of hard work.  When they move on it is very difficult to bring them back and we lose decades of experience associated with their field of expertise19.  Scientific research is not something that you do from 9-to-5 with a punch card clock.  You are always involved in it. It absorbs you like nothing else.  Defunding science has had a very drastic effect on our economy and prosperity and now on our health.
     As globalism takes root around the world (with concomitant and rapid exchange of everything including pathogens), as the human population continues increasing exponentially, as natural resources dwindle, and as we continue to pollute our ecosphere, we are creating the conditions for far worse pandemics, and ever worsening climate catastrophes which will cause the deaths and suffering of millions (if not billions) and create widespread food shortages.  This is what happens when you think you can control and don’t need to respect Nature - it will find a way to beat you down. 
     Humans are most terrified of phenomena that they do not understand. Science has given us a unique opportunity to study and respect Nature as unbiased and rational observers which has allowed us to garner novel insights about who we are and has helped us to develop novel technologies and strategies for our survival and prosperity.  Sadly, despite the fact that we all depend heavily on science, we are destroying science in this country by censoring and not listening to scientists and not supporting scientific research.  Yet,  as we abuse and overuse the miracles derived from scientific research, only scientists will be able to help us solve the critical problems generated from this abuse such as overpopulation, climate change, pollution of our ecosphere, pandemics (caused in large part by globalism and overpopulation), dwindling natural resources, etc.  These problems are only going to worsen with time as the world’s population continues to grow.  Yet, it’s like we’re going backward in time to the Middle Ages because the majority of humanity doesn’t understand science and don't even understand that they don't understand. I honestly shudder for the future of this country.
     When we eventually emerge from this horrific pandemic nightmare, we need to encourage science literacy in the general public so that citizens will elect scientifically-trained leaders – not just flashy verbalists who are unable to focus and who live by soundbytes and tweets, play golf, and jet set around the world clinking glass and hobnobbing with each other.  We need to have a serious debate about how to resurrect strong support and faith in science and scientists. If you can’t believe a scientist, whom can you believe?   
      With the vast majority of America’s overpaid but useless social, political and business science-illiterate “elites,” we are merely coasting on past scientific achievements and they are impotent when it comes to finding solutions that only scientists can.  This will doom us to an uncertain but certainly impoverished future because Nature will always ultimately win - we are part of Nature not the other way around, whether we like it or not.  It looks as if we are following the path of Ancient Rome20.
     Donald Trump had the right intentions when he sought to “Make America Great Again” but because he doesn’t understand precisely what it was that made America the superpower it is today, he and all of our leaders have faltered by not supporting science and the real heroes of our society:  scientists.

References:

Comments